August
2008.
High Cost of
Flying
Why is it
so expensive to fly? Every aircraft
owner could answer that. It
used to be the cost of parts, repairs,
government regulations, insurance, hangar
fees and so on. More recently,
its the price of fuel thats
on everyones mind.
In North
America, were paying close to
$7.00/gallon, while in European and other
countries, theyre being hosed for
well over twice that. Somehow,
there are still planes in the air.
Its
remarkable too that small charter and
training operations keep flying. The
regulations forced upon these guys by
Transport Canada and the FAA are enough
to choke the life out of anyone. To
run an air service, the operator requires
permission from the government in the
form of an Operating Certificate. That
O.C. outlines just about
everything the guy needs to do from when
he gets up in the morning until he goes
to sleep at night, usually about 16 to 20
hours later. Hes told where
and when he can fly, who he can hire,
what and how to train his employees, how
much he can charge, what insurance to
buy, how to outfit his aircraft, and
faces so many other on-going and new
regulations, it would be impossible to
list them all in any single document.
Its enough to make almost anyone
throw up his arms and walk away from the
mess.
Fortunately,
there are those who have the stamina and
the drive to push ahead to keep an air
operation going, until he runs out of
money anyway. For the traveling
public, that is a good thing. The
smaller operators in remote areas provide
a service for which there is no
alternative. Several of the major airlines
are in trouble, some will fold, but
well never run out of ways to get
around the world by air.
This is all
worth thinking about because ultimately,
the customer and the non-flying public
have some control over the costs involved
in flying. For example, who do you
think is responsible for most of the
regulations that force up costs? The
government for sure, but it comes from
people like a California woman, Kate
Hanni, who is an advocate for airline
passengers rights. She has
her case against American Airlines before
a Federal judge in Oakland, because
American left a planeload of passengers
stranded on a tarmac in Austin, Texas,
for nine hours in December 2006.
This woman formed the Coalition for
an Airline Passengers Rights
to take her case to the courts.
This group
of people, numbering over 21,000 and
growing, seems to be packing a big stick.
Theyve got several influential
members of government on their side.
They circulate petitions and run active
membership drives through websites.
They will undoubtedly succeed to some
degree with their goals. But at
what cost, and more to the point
is this the right way to deal with the
situation?
First of
all, the incident that got the ball
rolling was an American Airlines plane
being diverted around dangerous
thunderstorms. They were sent to Austin,
Texaswhere apparently gates and services
were already stretched beyond limits.
Consequently, although safely on the
ground, the airport and American were
simply unable to accommodate the
passengers with anything close to
first-class service. I cant
see where its much different from a
driver in a Saskatchewan snowstorm being
forced to spend the night at a
farmers home. He
wouldnt get a feather bed and
four-course breakfast for sure, but he
would be warm and safe. Youd
never hear of the traveler forming a
coalition to force all prairie farmers to
prepare their homes and accommodate
unfortunates who are stranded by weather.
It seems to
me that the whole system could be cleaned
up, the poor, inconsiderate,
money-grabbing operators could be culled
by the simple process of
supply-and-demand, and the world would
still be a happy place. If American
Airlines deliberately mistreated their
customers on a regular basis, it
wouldnt be long before they had no
customers to treat. Meantime, it
would open the door for an airline that
could see the opportunity for their own
good service to succeed.
Maybe this
is all too simple. Whats
missing here? What this Coalition
for Airline Passengers Rights is
attempting to do, is force even more
regulations on the air service operators.
They want government to wade in and
dictate rules, many of which would be
beyond the control of the airline, such
as assuring no plane sits on a tarmac for
more than three hours without having a
gate to dock at. Isnt that
at least partly the responsibility of the
airport? Many delays come from the
stuffed air traffic control system, a
major problem that could be seeing
breakthroughs with the next generation of
air traffic control.
Their
bill of rights goes on,
demanding personnel immediately available
to move passengers from one area of a
terminal to another, to ensure their
baggage shows up when and where its
supposed to, compensation of 150% of a
ticket price for those who are bumped by
postponed flights (for any reason).
There is a lot more, and you can see
their website for details.
I may be
cynical, but if we demand the government
to come in and start enforcing even more
regulations on all air operators,
isnt this ultimately going to push
ticket prices up even more? It
doesnt take a rocket scientist to
figure it out. The free market
always has, and will continue to weed out
the poor and greedy business operators.
The result of more and more regulation
can only mean a higher and higher costs
for all air operators and all customers.
If American
Airlines is truly negligent and greedy,
or is just inefficient and needs a
business plan overhaul, then it will
ultimately face the market and make the
changes needed. Or, it will simply
disappear. Adding more regulations
will eventually ensure the demise of all
air operators.
Back to
main page
|